Talk:Keith Fowler

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Keith Fowler article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 19 February 2012 by reviewer CharlieEchoTango (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

KFFOWLER (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (confirmed autobiography activity)

Help, please, to improve objectivity

I need some veterans' advice regarding the biographical article, KEITH FOWLER, posted by myself, but with I believe neutral tone and objective value. It is not for me a vanity project so much as a way of positioning a great deal of information missing regarding theater art in the US corridor from MA to VA in the 1960s and '70s (and some data from San Francisco in the '50s). My field is theater, acting and directing, and also producing. I saw many lapses of data on Wikipedia and began with a piece on my mentor, Nikos Psacharopoulos, who developed the Williamstown Theater Festival, and I have begun (and now posted) a piece on Jules Irving and M. Elizabeth Osborn, my former dramaturg, after whom an important playwriting award was established. In the '70s, I headed two LORT theaters in Richmond VA that were, in turn, the base of new play development and serious social attempts to unify the black and white communities of a major southern city. As I revisit that history on line and even in published accounts, I find that much of the controversy, politics, and head-on artistic conflict has been lost to memory--perhaps too conveniently for those who may be happy to forget. Bloggers can barely recall the names of the largest Equity companies in the city, and digital newspaper sources do not go far enough back. But I have boxes of hard copy scannable newspaper and magazine sources and can support my assertions--without resorting to creative writing.

My question is an open one: Please help me to spot where my objectivity fails! I am certain it does, or I wouldn't be tagged for possible unreliability. I think I am neutral (well, neutral-ish) but know that other eyes are necessary. Help, please. KFFOWLER (talk) 10:42, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to go work on other articles where it is easier to be (and be perceived as) objective. The records you have (I agree they probably have some historical value) - try to find a archive that will keep (and index) them. Have a look at http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/result?q= for a great digitization project....

Unfortunately I am not in a position to help with the current article (no sources / no knowledge); post a short version of this note in other places help desk / project space, etc..... Regards, Ariconte (talk) 21:30, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your taking time with me. I am working on several other pieces and find it easier to know my level of objectivity there. I understand that our fields may not overlap, so I'll hope for an eye that can pick out my specific problems. Thanks very much for the lead to the gov. trove! KFFOWLER (talk) 22:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keith Fowler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004212521/http://drama.arts.uci.edu/mfadirecting.html to http://drama.arts.uci.edu/mfadirecting.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent death

I see on social media this morning that one of the subject's children has announced the subject's death yesterday. I also see an ip contributor has added that information, inadvertently hijacking the birthdate source. I've reverted that edit but will be looking better sources. In addition, I'll list his user account as deceased, because it's a family member making this public announcement. Wikipedia's condolences go out to User:KFFOWLER's family. BusterD (talk) 16:13, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an obituary released by the family at everloved.com. Looking for news sources but not seeing anything yet. BusterD (talk) 10:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think that’s good enough to confirm somebody has died in this context since he was not a celebrity or other high-profile individual. If nobody objects I think we can change Mr. Fowler’s article to accurately reflect his passing. Dronebogus (talk) 00:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]